FF ramblings

[ria_oaks]

I happened to check Rpgamer.com a few minutes ago and noticed that FFIII:DS comes out today (I haven't really been keeping track...). I'm probably just being too over-emotional, but this day feels rather historic in the RPG world - the last Final Fantasy that wasn't released in the US is finally here. I checked, and it's been approximately 16.5 years since FFIII was released in Japan - well, better late than never, I guess. XD I mean sure, I played it years ago on a translated ROM and I won't be buying this version anytime soon (lack of a DS... and lack of time to play. woe.), but it's still cool to think that it's here. It's sort of a pity that the original version of the game will never make it here, most likely (how hard would it have been to include the orignal version in the new game, really...?), but the new version looks pretty spiffy. Hopefully I'll get to play it someday.

3 FF games in the past 2 weeks, 2 of which are new to the US (FFXII and FFIII:DS) and one of which only ever made it here in a mangled fashion (FFV Advance) - makes me miss the days when I could play all the time... I haven't really been into gaming as much the last few years, largely because of a. lack of time during school, b. other interests take up my free time, and c. i'm lazy., but I still get excited hearing about games and still want to play when I get the chance. I'm way behind on all the games I'm playing, but I still plan to ask for either FFXII or Disgaea 2 for Christmas (leaning towards the latter - FFXII will be easy enough to find for years to come, and it'll get cheap fairly quickly, whereas Disgaea 2 will start disappearing soon...). I am sorely tempted by FFXII, though - it's been getting fantastic reviews, and hell, it's FFXII! We've been waiting for this game for years, and it's finally here... and I really can't justify the time or money to get it. Part of me, too, is still a bit uncertain about it - but most of the reviews have said that the game is nothing like (and much better than) anything we've seen of it to this point, including the demo. I plan to give it a chance eventually, but can't do it yet.

And... I'm procrastinating. Back to my Farscape paper... it's due tomorrow at 9, so I need to get moving. Up to 5 pages, need about 12 - and I'm still blathering on about the context, haven't even gotten to analysing the series itself! Ehehehe. baaack to work.

Comments

[ria-oaks.livejournal.com]

So glad he got arrested. :P What did you think of the rest of the episode?

8 or 15. I looked it up on Zap2It just for you. XD

They've got Richards on right now via satellite... he's apologizing, and he's obviously having a bad time of it. He isn't looking too good... and wow does he look a lot older than he did on Seinfeld. He says that he lost his temper and said some horrible things. Now he's saying that he isn't a racist and he just said those things out of a burst of spontaneous anger. He's really beat up about it... definitely regrets it and can't believe that it happened.

Okay, commercial break now.

[bk635.livejournal.com]

Don't spoil it for me. Yuu~~

"Braaad..."

[ria-oaks.livejournal.com]

Oops, sorry. XD Just got caught up in watching it and describing it... anyway, it was interesting and there was some funny stuff with Seinfeld later. Stick around; there's a funny clip from the s7 DVD. :)

[bk635.livejournal.com]

At 11:30 p.m. here too, right?

It's still pretty hard to believe that he'd let all that out with no restraint though. I hope it doesn't put a pall on my enjoyment of Seinfeld. :/ I was watching it earlier and I couldn't believe that the same person who said those things was Kramer. I guess it's sometimes hard to disassociate the character from the actor. The Seinfeld Curse.

[ria-oaks.livejournal.com]

Yup. Seinfeld comes on ~11:50, though there's some funny stuff beforehand (including the requisite Letterman Top Ten about the TomKat wedding...).

Me too. I couldn't really bring myself to watch Seinfeld today. I can disassociate character from actor in the sense that I know he's not really the character, but I still know that I'm watching an actor who is performing a role in a certain way. Part of the joy in watching characters is seeing how the actors portray them. Hence why I enjoy watching my favourite actors portray different roles, and why the more I see of them & know about them the more I think of them as the actor rather than the character. Like Chris Meloni, who I like as a person and as a talented actor, and therefore enjoy watching him for him. So when an actor does something fucking stupid, it's hard to enjoy their work quite as much... note the decrease in people's enjoyment of watching Tom Cruise act - popular opinion of him effects how people view him in films, and therefore people are less inclined to watch his movies these days.

[bk635.livejournal.com]

I wonder if it would be possible to buy a PS3 on eBay for like $5, assuming no one else bids? Is this possible?

[ria-oaks.livejournal.com]

I doubt it. XD Theoretically possible, but very unlikely.

[bk635.livejournal.com]

Those auctions aren't moving. Might be worthwhile to hound that page for some poor guy, who bought 6 PS3's looking to make a profit, get desparate..

Even if someone else bid on it, getting one anywhere for ~$150 would be a steal.

[ria-oaks.livejournal.com]

Lol. Go ahead and try. XD Good luck..

I'm amused by the 1 million+ auctions. That's just... bizarre. Who the hell would actually bid on those when other ones are going for $800-1500?

[bk635.livejournal.com]

No one. Those $1 million or more auctions aren't legit, and I honestly don't understand the thought process behind making false bids which jack the auction that high.

[ria-oaks.livejournal.com]

Guess not. Though it seems odd that they have high ratings percentages and a lot of feedback... all faked?? Or I guess they have legit auctions and for some reason create a faked one, too.

[bk635.livejournal.com]

I just saw the apology from Richards. It seemed pretty sincere to me.. Saying "I'm sorry" probably isn't enough though, but still.

I felt bad for him. You could easily tell he was shaken up over it and yet the audience continued to laugh at him to the point where Jerry had to step in and tell them to be quiet.

[ria-oaks.livejournal.com]

It did seem sincere. He looked really bad... But it's still hard to understand how that could've happened - I don't think he even fully understands, himself. I'm just watching Entertainmnet Tonight and they're saying that his career is probably irrepairable, and they're most likely right. It'd be hard to come back from something like that; people just aren't going to look at him the same way again. It's harder for me now to watch Seinfeld and appreciate his talent, even though he is definitely very talented. It's a pity.

[bk635.livejournal.com]

I dunno.. What he did was inexcusable, really.. But part of me wants to find an excuse.. I mean, I watched Seinfeld and he looked like the happiest guy on Earth, but when I saw the apology he seemed so...broken. I couldn't believe it; it made me sad. And it really made me angry hearing people not respecting him when he was trying to be sincere (although I'm not trying to imply that he still deserves our respect; but that's up to the individual to decide). He almost seemed, and I hate to say it, suicidal. Although I'm probably way off-base with that impression.

His career is most likely over now (I heard he got banned from that particular club). But I mean, didn't Mel Gibson also come out with some racial slur in public a while ago? I know it wasn't as extreme as Richards', but what happened with that?

Although Jerry's bit about the children's birthday parties was quite funny.

"Have you experienced this thing of this square inflatable cube..that.. It's like a portable mental facility for children?"

"It's like the big bouncy thing?"

"Yeah it's a bouncy and..and they have a slot in the front and you insert your child into the slot..and then the child shows you what their real personality is."

"It's just a portable lawsuit that's what"

"Yes..and then the birthday party clown that wants to talk to me about his comedy career..That.. I... I just hate it. I can't take it."

Made me laugh hard. :o

[ria-oaks.livejournal.com]

I know what you mean. Part of me wishes there was a way to explain it to make it somehow less bad than it is... I did feel sorry for him in spite of myself; it seemed as though he just spontaneously blurted out things that he doesn't believe. Or maybe does subconsciously. Unfortunately, just feeling bad about it doesn't make it excusable.

I really have no idea what happened with Mel Gibson; I don't pay much attention to celebrity gossip (I know the very basics that pretty much everyone knows; beyond that, I'm in the dark about celebrity stuff). I know generally what he did, but I'm not sure what exactly he said beyond 'anti-Semitic comments' and I don't know much about the fallout beyond "people were pissed". And he hasn't exactly been Mr. Popular sinec Passion of the Christ. ^^;

Yeah, Jerry was funny. That part was amusing. I liked the little cartoon clip from the DVD, too.

[bk635.livejournal.com]

A lot of people (on the Internet at least) seem to equate racial slur with racist personality. At least that's what I noticed browsing various forums. If I called a black man a nigger, does that automatically label me a racist? Those are just words. I'm not a racist; I don't believe one race is superior to another, so my words are hollow - they're wrong, yes, but there's no meaning behind them. It's like, how many times have you been upset at your parents and yelled out "I hate you!"? We've all done it, in anger, but did we really mean it? No.

Honestly, that's just what I hope it was, but I don't know the guy, and regardless of how much truth was behind those words, the public probably won't sway to his favor anymore. I wish someone we didn't like did it..Like um, Tom Cruise. He's fun to hate. :D

[ria-oaks.livejournal.com]

Maybe, but I think the thing with words like that is that they do have meaning - they've been used for so long to insult and oppress people that they've become strongly imbued with meaning. I'm not sure that it's the same as saying things like "I hate you" or "I want to kill my prof" or whatever, simply because that word is so powerful. People don't say that word as something hollow and meaningless, or at least when they do people are understandably offended. It's like the word 'fag' - I read an article on that last year, about how it's used by teenage boys in a way that they don't connect with homosexuality at all, but the history of the word and the way they're using it (basically to call each other weak/unmanly) still has obvious connotations of homophobia (though interestingly, they said in interview excerpts that they would never call a gay person a fag because they know that that's wrong).

Again, I honestly think it comes down a lot to simple history. It's only been fifty years since the Civil Rights Movement, and in spite of the many strides made there is still a lot of racism today. Maybe in a hundred years it won't matter as much, and race/racism simply won't be an issue, but right now we're still working towards equality.

Haha, imagine if Tom Cruise said something like that, yeah... now that would actually be kinda funny. XD

[bk635.livejournal.com]

Yeah, this is pretty much the argument I see on the Internet regarding the Richards matter. One faction argues that the words are just words without any meaning behind them, and other faction argues the opposite. Both complete with insults and spelling errors, because it wouldn't be an Internet argument without them. I'd rather not start that up here though. ;p

I think it would be POSITIVE attention for Tom. That's fucked up. But it would be funny nonetheless. Fucking psycho.