Date: 2006-11-23 06:38 am (UTC)
Yeah, this is pretty much the argument I see on the Internet regarding the Richards matter. One faction argues that the words are just words without any meaning behind them, and other faction argues the opposite. Both complete with insults and spelling errors, because it wouldn't be an Internet argument without them. I'd rather not start that up here though. ;p

I think it would be POSITIVE attention for Tom. That's fucked up. But it would be funny nonetheless. Fucking psycho.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

ria_oaks: (Default)
ria_oaks

November 2012

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 11th, 2025 01:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios