ext_318588 ([identity profile] bk635.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] ria_oaks 2006-11-23 06:38 am (UTC)

Yeah, this is pretty much the argument I see on the Internet regarding the Richards matter. One faction argues that the words are just words without any meaning behind them, and other faction argues the opposite. Both complete with insults and spelling errors, because it wouldn't be an Internet argument without them. I'd rather not start that up here though. ;p

I think it would be POSITIVE attention for Tom. That's fucked up. But it would be funny nonetheless. Fucking psycho.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting